[address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Sat Feb 6 21:20:07 CET 2016
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 08:55:45PM +0100, Erik Bais - A2B Internet wrote: >The policy proposal states : > >> 2.2 Transfer Restrictions > >> Scarce resources, which are understood as those resources that >> are allocated or assigned >by the RIPE NCC on a restricted >> basis (such as IPv4 or 16-bit ASNs), cannot be >transferred >> for 24 months from the date the resource was received by the >> resource holder. >This restriction also applies if the >> resource was received due to a change in the >> organisationâs business (such as a merger or >> acquisition). > > >Point 2.2 already states what is to be understood by scares >resources. All RIPE NCC issued IPv4 and 16bit ASNs. In that case, there is a conflict between the proposal and the impact statement. 2.2 seems to suggest that the NCC unilaterally declares a resource "scarce" and the impact statement says the Community does that - presumably through policy. Why not re-word 2.2 to be the authoritative list of "scarce" resources and any additions/rmovals can be done via the PDP? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]