[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] trouble with email client repreated messages
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guy Chilton
guych at btireland.net
Mon Apr 18 16:33:44 CEST 2016
Hello, I've read the proposal and arguments for and against and indeed all the various different opinions presented. Although I can see some merit to support the proposal from a needs based perspective and use of reclaimed addresses. Personally I cannot however ignore the fact that new LIR's into the future will need IPv4 to implement IPv6 based solutions of whatever flavour, and therefore I cannot support this policy change as I believe the current policy is fit for purpose. To confirm I do not support this policy proposal. Kind Regards, Guy On 14/04/2016 13:41, Marco Schmidt wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > The Discussion Period for the policy proposal 2015-05, "Last /8 > Allocation Criteria Revision" has been extended until 13 May 2016. > > The goal of this proposal is to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 > IPv4 allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. > > The text of the proposal has been revised based on mailing list feedback > and we have published a new version (2.0) today. As a result, a new > Discussion Phase has started for the proposal. > > Some of the differences from version 1.0 include: > - Additional /22 IPv4 allocations can be only provided from address > space outside 185/8 > - Only LIRs with less than a /20 in total are eligible to receive > additional allocations > - LIRs must document their IPv6 deployment as part of the request > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 > > We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments > to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>. > > Regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] trouble with email client repreated messages
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]