[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

+1 to this policy

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Carsten Schiefner <ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
> wrote:

> Adrian,
>
> from my PoV we could start to debate you argument:
>
> On 15.04.2016 11:02, Adrian Pitulac wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > The discussion regarding the last /8 policy benefit can be long, but
> > from statistics and from my point of view, ARIN depletion of pools,
> > resulted directly in IPV6 growth. Everyone talks about why RIPE IPv6
> > hasn't exploded. I think the reason is IPv4 pools still available. If
> > market will be constrained by lack of IPv4 pools then IPv6 will explode.
>
> if there aren't *ANY* 2nd market IPv4 brokers operating in the ARIN
> region *AT ALL*.
>
> Which AFAIK is not the case.
>
> So fulfilling IPv4 address space needs in the North American region
> should be, give or take, as cheap or expensive, as easy or complicated
> as anywhere else.
>
> So this effect might only be very loosely coupled at best.
>
> How about assuming that the US, North America in general, is simply
> again leading the pack in eventually deploying a not-so-new-any-longer
> technology? They have done this already in the past, so I have heart. ;-)
>
> Best,
>
>         -C.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160418/dcd019c5/attachment.html>