[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Sun Apr 17 23:59:01 CEST 2016
Riccardo, On 15.04.2016 07:48, Riccardo Gori wrote: > with all respect I don't see a "remarkable success" in current last /8 > policy. > We are dealing with the same amount of space as September 2012 so it works as designed me thinks. > that in the meanwhile has been abused in several ways Please define "abuse in several ways". You are also encouraged to suggest potential remedies per item. > and there are really no incentives to IPv6 adoption. How about: making your Internet outfit future-poof? Sounds pretty convincing to me. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]