[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Sun Apr 17 04:59:56 CEST 2016
On Sunday 17 April 2016, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >> well, it is some years too late for it to go along with the last /8, > >> policy unless you have a time machine. but it might mean we won't have > >> to deal with the endless proposals to modify the last /8 policy which > >> seem to come up every year, flood the mailing list, and eventually fail. > > Exactly, the sad part is, this is essentially the last and only thing you > > can propose a policy regarding v4. > > not exactly. one can propose something in the opposite direction; > allocations from the last /8 be reduced to /24. it may make ipv4 > last longer for the new entrants. and a /24 should be sufficient > for a large nat. > > i.e. i was serious the other day. Well, if you do, make sure take the companion policy with you this time:) otherwise we might go though the discussion we had this time(distribute it faster) every year for a very long time:) P.s.i have no objection to future extend the last /8, but simple economics suggest it might not work as new member would be effectively be charged at 5 euro/IP/year if they only get /24, and changing member charging scheme are very difficult and unlikely to happen. But, it does provide an hassal free way for small companies get their own IP address for a long time to come as transfer market are still not that transparent and easy to deal with. > > randy > -- -- Kind regards. Lu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160417/467c2972/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]