[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lu Heng
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Sun Apr 17 04:30:57 CEST 2016
On Sunday 17 April 2016, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >>> I seriously liking the idea of some APNIC colleagues "no more v4 > >>> policy from today on". > >> that was my proposal. the sitting apnic address policy chair went into > >> bureaucratic insanity and drowned it. > > Hoesntly, I think it is best companion policy goes alone with the last > > /8 policy, as we all know and expected people would love to come back > > propose to get the last piece of free pile eatted now instead of in > > few years. > > well, it is some years too late for it to go along with the last /8, > policy unless you have a time machine. but it might mean we won't have > to deal with the endless proposals to modify the last /8 policy which > seem to come up every year, flood the mailing list, and eventually fail. > > Exactly, the sad part is, this is essentially the last and only thing you can propose a policy regarding v4. But if it is indeed the only thing you can propose about v4(to distribute last /8 faster than now), and most folks here agree that we shouldn't do that, then it is a simple logic, the only policy you can propose regarding v4 will be something people surely disagree, why would we need future proposal regarding v4. randy > -- -- Kind regards. Lu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160417/1fbce375/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]