[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sat Apr 16 13:24:06 CEST 2016
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 11:21, Tim Chown wrote: > > On 15 Apr 2016, at 10:02, Adrian Pitulac <adrian at idsys.ro> wrote: > > > > but from statistics and from my point of view, ARIN depletion of pools, resulted directly in IPV6 growth. > > Well, no, not if you look at > https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, which shows steady > IPv6 growth towards Google services (approaching 11% now). That's global. For Canada : http://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/CA that's clearly visible. Less so for the US. > Similarly wrt active IPv6 routes - > http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/index.html Route count, like allocations made by RIRs is completely irrelevant. Having IPv6 announced but null-routed at the border and completely absent inside the network (or only present on core equipment) is commonplace.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]