[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sat Apr 16 12:12:01 CEST 2016
Hi Erik, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, at 22:07, Erik Bais wrote: > If we currently have about 12.000 members .. and hand out additional > /22’s to each of them, it will cost 12 milj addresses ( more or less..) > ( as it would be more fair than discriminating on current size and age of > an LIR … ) We won't "hand them out". We live them the choice to ask. Please note that some of them didn't request their /22 as per current policy. > The pool won’t grow much more than it is currently … We are aware. > So handing out 12 milj. addresses in a single gift.. without the hard Again, we are not doing this in a "single gift". Or at least it is not what we wanted to say. > requirement to not allow final /8 policy received IP space to be > transferred, will most likely only increase the run-out of the IP space > and not fix anything.. This is something worth discussing. I think enough people were complaining about this in order to start discussing this more seriously. > If we hand out 12 milj. Addresses of the 16.4 milj. We have 4.4 milj. > addresses left.. meaning that we will have a full run-out within 18 > months. Then again, we are not talking about handing out in one shot ! Otherwise, I can understand your point of view. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]