[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dominik Nowacki
dominik at clouvider.co.uk
Thu Apr 14 19:27:25 CEST 2016
Perhaps you'd care to keep this discussion Civil? Kind Regards, Dom -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: 14 April 2016 18:24 To: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> Cc: RIPE address policy WG <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision) i do not support pigs at the last /8 trough the purpose of the single last /8 allocation was to allow NEW ENTRY. pigs coming back to the trough every 18 months is not new anything. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]