[address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Mon Sep 14 12:14:06 CEST 2015
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 09:33, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > I would be interested in getting an educated guess what would happen if > we went with the following policy: > > You get /20 to /24 depending on need/want instead of /22 for everybody. > > This would apply until we have last-/10 where we then go to /22-/24 > depending on need/want. We would treat recovered pool the same as last > /8, it's just treated as "addresses" so /10 is "/10 worth of adresses". Point taken and thanks for the feedback. Good to see some people looking at more than /22 in one shot. > My goal is still to have IPv4 addresses according to this policy by 2020. :) -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]