[address-policy-wg] 2015-05

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:27:03PM +0100, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
> Things are a little bit more complex than that, but globally you are
> right, and we should have been more vocal years ago, when nonsense
> started to develop (no need, no new PI, PI trasnfer, ...).

The "nonsense", as you call it, has been the result of long discussions
on this very mailing list, leading to community consensus that this is
what we want our policy to be.  If you don't understand the reasoning
behind the changes, it would be useful to read up the discussions in 
the archives.

It does not suit the proposer of a policy change very well to call earlier
policy changes "nonsense".

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151029/f77ea64e/attachment.sig>