[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Oct 21 23:00:18 CEST 2015
Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:18:44PM +0300, Ciprian Nica wrote: > Assignments are between LIR and end user and at this moment RIPE doesn't > care much about them, only, as you mentioned, that they are properly > reflected in the registry. > > If there were a policy already allowing RIPE to get back allocations, I > think the situation would have been different (I can't stop thinking > about my chinese "friend") > > Maybe it is time to create such policy. It will not be easy but maybe we > are able to come up with some rules that NCC can implement and get back > some of the space that we all know it's just waiting for a better price. I could point out that *this* would very much be "retroactively applying policy"... (And there would still never be sufficient IPv4, so I think that's why the community decided a few years ago to not bother going there - we've discussed this at RIPE meetings every now and then, and decided to better focus on making good IPv6 policies instead) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151021/8de69316/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]