[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksey Bulgakov
aleksbulgakov at gmail.com
Wed Oct 21 17:53:51 CEST 2015
I really envy to all of you that you have so much free time to write messages here during all day and increase noise. 21 окт. 2015 г. 18:48 пользователь "Sander Steffann" <sander at steffann.nl> написал: > Hi, > > > Op 20 okt. 2015, om 23:57 heeft Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN < > ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> het volgende geschreven: > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 20:00, Randy Bush wrote: > >> what is it that people do not understand about "gone, no more, we're > >> out, ...?" > > > > Because it's NOT. Not yet. Not in RIPE-land, not in APNIC-land, not even > > in LACNIC-land. Not to mention AfriNIC-land. > > The current policy is "we reserved some address space so that new entrants > are not blocked from the market". I have seen many people interpret that as > "we have not yet run out". For all practical purposes we *have* run out. > What we have left is not normal address distribution anymore but a > "special" situation. Business-as-usual with IPv4 doesn't exist anymore. To > be blunt I think that "we haven't run out" is a extremely misguided (a.k.a. > delusional) viewpoint... > > The point of this policy proposal is to see whether we can optimise this > special situation by changing some of the parameters. To discuss if the > results of changing i.e. "one /22" to "one /22 every 18 months" would help > people while still providing an acceptable timeframe for being able to give > addresses to new entrants. > > But please realise that the normal IPv4 pool has run out and we are only > discussing the usage of a reservation we made for special circumstances. > > Cheers, > Sander > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151021/6187c9c0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]