[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Netskin NOC
noc at netskin.com
Wed Oct 21 14:31:54 CEST 2015
Am 21.10.2015 um 14:20 schrieb Ciprian Nica: > From theese, the top 1% PA resource holders (117 organisations) have > allocations totalling 363,535,872 IPs out of the total 575,180,544 > ALLOCATED PA IPs in RIPE region. (that is 63.20%) > > If the remaining 99% percent would fully deploy IPv6 then the region's > average would be at 36.80%, which would not be enough to make us forget > about IPv4. > > Therefore, in my oppinion, this is not a problem that can be solved by > the many but by the few top providers. Think about policies that would > "drive them to drive us all" towards IPv6 adoption. That would really help. > That's exactly my point. The current policy is mostly against new providers (I know many think it's a policy to help them). What about my previous suggestion, like a policy to force ipv4 space holders to return ex. 10% of their ipv4 per year. Money/ effort involved with the transition is no valid concern against it, because the same would hold true for the /21 limit for new LIRs. Corin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]