[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

Hi,
I'm against this proposal. It seems that economic interests are the main reason for that. From my personal point of view: with IPv6 there is a good replacement solution to connect network devices. So there is no need to offer IPv4 addresses in a larger amount from the RIR.
Best,
Carsten

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Marco Schmidt
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 14:47
An: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Betreff: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

Dear colleagues,

A new RIPE Policy proposal, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria", is now available for discussion.

The goal of this proposal is to allow LIRs to request an additional /22
IPv4 allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months.

You can find the full proposal at:

    https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05

We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 18 November 2015.

Regards

Marco Schmidt
Policy Development Officer
RIPE NCC