[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Tomasz Śląski @ KEBAB"
tom at kebab.org.pl
Tue Oct 20 17:00:20 CEST 2015
W dniu 2015-10-20 o 16:56, Aleksey Bulgakov pisze: > Dear, all. > > I think it will be rightly to make progressive allocating depend on > current resource number and age of the LIR. > > E.g. > LIR has /16 - he can ask /16 or equivalent > Or > First 18 months - /22, second 18 months months - /21, third 18 months - /20 etc. > > I think it will supplement 2015-01 very good. > Do you think, that the remaining space from last /8 is made of rubber? -- Tomasz Śląski pl.skonet
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]