[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
erik at bais.name
Tue Oct 20 16:28:53 CEST 2015
> first, i think all LIRs with POCs whose family name begins with B should get a /16 I fully agree on that.. Erik -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] Namens Randy Bush Verzonden: dinsdag 20 oktober 2015 16:27 Aan: James Blessing <james.blessing at despres.co.uk> CC: Address Policy Working Group <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> Onderwerp: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria) >> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 > Can we limit it this to a /X to see what the impact is before throwing > the entire remaining v4 space under a bus? first, i think all LIRs with POCs whose family name begins with B should get a /16 randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]