[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Tue Oct 20 16:01:02 CEST 2015
Based on current v6 deploy rate, my guess is in 5 years an new start up LIR would still appreciate a free /22 available for them. > On 20 Oct 2015, at 2:52 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN <ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:16, h.lu at anytimechinese.com wrote: >> Sounds not bad idea, if current pool last us more than 5 years...but on >> the other hand, If it will shorten the lasting period below 5, I would >> not support it. > > 5 years seems borderline even with existing policy. > Then, in about 3 years APNIC and LACNIC would have probbaly run out dry > (ARIN already did) and spill-over to RIPE area could be expected. Just > look at the existing us.* LIRs having only 185 v4 address-space. > > -- > Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN > fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]