[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
h.lu at anytimechinese.com
Tue Oct 20 15:16:06 CEST 2015
Sounds not bad idea, if current pool last us more than 5 years...but on the other hand, If it will shorten the lasting period below 5, I would not support it. > On 20 Oct 2015, at 1:46 PM, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy proposal, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria", > is now available for discussion. > > The goal of this proposal is to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 > IPv4 allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 18 November 2015. > > Regards > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]