[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 20/10/15 14:02, James Blessing wrote:
> Can we limit it this to a /X to see what the impact is before
> throwing the entire remaining v4 space under a bus?

I was thinking the very same, actually.

If we're thinking that the current policy has been too conservative,
it seems like we should be cautious not to swing too far in the other
direction (too liberal).

- -- 
Tom Hill
Network Engineer

Bytemark Hosting
http://www.bytemark.co.uk/
tel. +44 1904 890 890
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWJj57AAoJEH2fKbrp2sQ667cIAKqXrjTZ6G8INUXbLWoyX9Si
za3OLzLUUA1bXwMffhzXkPhbDx5LWSosXuuFOkys2J3UgyvSyAN2OPhdwoPteblN
xr9RZUPaIkzhSLJEA+2tvABvW5OvCGJ298K8OnEjIWZpp/Oh/fsMbfETrqCE4nau
GxbT8mIxWG9oqdrpAU1TuQces6AYasJvvcXK1bkvkTMTgurXqITuPjb+EaTasADE
Reo4A0O9RnLgRVMElVcNP61DWNpZp/WOLSqBH8rlzI0nexySAZAvQteSnfDkL/vi
YQcTQP6SNSD//aOp4MycRfj9QIHniyhpWRYH/+z0LJ+oxiHwwMpquSP3O9oWKhY=
=gteR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----