[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Garry Glendown
garry at nethinks.com
Tue Oct 20 15:12:27 CEST 2015
Guten Tag, > On 2015 Oct 20 (Tue) at 14:46:54 +0200 (+0200), Marco Schmidt wrote: > : https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 > > From the proposed text: > 5.1.3.2. There is enough space in the free pool to perform the allocation > > Is there a definition of "enough space in the free pool"? Is it a > single /22? > According to the proposal I'd say yes ... of course, that's the basic use case of a pool - to use it. Anyway, maybe I have overlooked it, but there doesn't seem to be a provision as to whether an actual need is documented, e.g. less than 25% free of currently assigned space or less than 1 /24 available, whichever is less. -garry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]