[address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Nov 17 10:41:10 CET 2015
>> Every LIR really has to accept that they have to wean themselves off >> IPv4 and have a serious approach to using IPv6. You’re going to have >> to do this at some point. You might as well do it now. IPv4 >> allocations from the RIRs are not going to last forever. Changing >> the address policy for everyone just so you can continue with an >> IPv4-only networking approach for a few more months is both unfair >> and unwise. > > Well said, Jim. FWIW, I'm agreeing fully with what you say here. The > current "last /8" policy is working the way it should. the only thing i would add, with extreme sadness and some disgust, it that they could do as many have, go nat/cgn. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]