[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Huberman
David.Huberman at microsoft.com
Wed Nov 11 22:55:26 CET 2015
Very good input, thank you Wilfried! Does anyone else have any suggestions or objections to: "A new AS number is only assigned when the network architecture and/or project has a need that cannot be satisfied by an existing AS number." If there are no objections to this part of the text, that gives the WG a good foundation to build on in Bucharest, in my opinion. David David R Huberman Principal, Global IP Addressing Microsoft Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: Wilfried Woeber [mailto:Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at] > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 12:00 AM > To: David Huberman <David.Huberman at microsoft.com> > Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn > (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments) > > David Huberman wrote: > > > Thank you, ytti. > > > > So let's start with the basics. Does the following text allow the NCC to meet > the needs of network operators today? > > > > "A new AS number is only assigned when the network architecture > > I would be more edxplicit and more flexible here, by adding e.g. > > or project > > > has a need that cannot be satisfied with an existing AS number." > > Looking at SDN stuff and pilot projects or testbeds, or even trainings or > workshops, I can see the need to interconnect such projects with the 'real' > net and to use globally unique AS numbers. > > I do understanf that "network architecture" can be interpreted as a rather > wide and flexible term, but we should try to provide as good guidance as we > can to support the evaluation of requests by the IPRAs. > > Wilfried > > > There will be more policy text. But again, let's start with -- and agree on -- > the basics. > > > > Thanks! > > David > > > > David R Huberman > > Principal, Global IP Addressing > > Microsoft Corporation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]