[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
d.baeza at tvt-datos.es
Tue Nov 10 11:41:25 CET 2015
El 10/11/2015 a las 10:49, Peter Hessler escribió: > On 2015 Nov 10 (Tue) at 04:30:22 +0000 (+0000), Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > :Just for my understanding, is there any demand for 16b ASN from the > :community? > > There is a technical case when attempting to use communities in the > <as>:<as> format. There is not yet a 32:32b community available, > even in extended communities. 16b:32b and 32b:16b do exist, so I'm not > sure how critical that is. And that is critical. I only have a 32b ASN and is impossible to work with communities while 32b:32b comm doesnt exists.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]