[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 14:01:39 CET 2015
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Dominik Nowacki <dominik at clouvider.co.uk> wrote: > > I think the policy should allow for the subsequent allocations from the > last /8, but only if the space is not only not transferred out of the LIR > account in the period of 18 months AND the LIR was not renting the space > from the last /8 to another entities within the last 18 months period > (solely, not as part of another service). > > > > What do you think ? > How do you propose that RIPE NCC go about acquiring that information and enforcing that regulation? Is there a bit of confusion regarding what a LIR is? https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-management/faq/independent-resources/phase-three/what-is-a-local-internet-registry-lir -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151102/f121aa06/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]