[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Enno Rey
erey at ernw.de
Wed May 27 20:33:07 CEST 2015
All, I'd like to strongly support the proposal as well. To be fully honest here I've not yet encountered a single adress planning exercise where "we" (which included organizations with +300K users and 700K IP addresses in their IPAM database) didn't easily get along with a /32. I hence initially shared the scepticism ("Rly? who needs more than a /29?") brought up at the mic and on the mailing list. Still, I found the perspective laid out by Mathew convincing and in general I think RIPE policies (and their assumptions) shouldn't come into the way of organizations with flexible needs based on their individual environments. Overall the criteria provided by John (Collins) can be a reasonable starting point for the development of criteria needed, but they'll probably need some refinement. Best Enno On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:22:14PM +0200, Thomas01.Schmidt at conti.de wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > On Fri May 22 John Collins wrote: > > ----------------------------------------- > > Finally, I would like to call on the many "Enterprise LIRs" out there to > consider this suggestion and if it makes sense to support it on the > mailing-list. Also I ask the many "ISP LIRs" to lend their consideration > and support. Your feedback is important. The success of IPv6 depends on > both LIR categories gaining access to sufficient address space. > > ----------------------------------------- > > I represent on of these "Enterprise LIRs" and like to support this > proposal. The organisational structure could request specific > consideration in the IP address management design (e.g. caused by M&A, > subsidaries or divisional independencies under a holding). The removed > text in the new policy proposal > > ------------------begin--------------- > > If so, the allocation size will be based on the number of existing users > and the extent of the organisation's infrastructure. > > -----------------end------------------ > > gives the freedom to allocated an address design independ by the number of > existing users. > We currently face the existing limitation by become LIR at ARIN and APNIC > too. The additional address allocations helps us to cover the global parts > of the company with sufficient address space but with additional expenses > and costs. > > > Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Kind regards / Meilleures salutations > > Thomas Schmidt > IT Corporate Infrastructure Strategy, Network > IT CO IN ST N > > Continental AG > Vahrenwalder Str. 9, D-30165 Hannover, GERMANY > > Phone: 0049 511 938-1269 > Telefax: 0049 511 938-81269 > Email: Thomas01.Schmidt at conti.de > http://www.conti.com > http://www.continental-corporation.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Postfach/Postbox 1 69, D-30001 Hannover > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: > Prof. Dr. Ing. Wolfgang Reitzle > Vorstand/Executive Board: Dr. Elmar Degenhart (Vorsitzender/Chairman), > Jose A. Avila, Dr. Ralf Cramer, Frank Jourdan, Helmut Matschi, > Dr. Ariane Reinhart, Wolfgang Schaefer, Nikolai Setzer, Hans-Juergen > Duensing > Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Hannover > Registergericht/Registered Court: Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 3527, > USt.-ID-Nr./VAT-ID-No. DE 115645799 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Proprietary and confidential. Distribution only by express > authority of Continental AG or its subsidiaries. -- Enno Rey ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Enno Rey ======================================================= Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator =======================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]