[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Review Period extended until 19 May 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Review Period extended until 19 May 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Review Period extended until 19 May 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Tue May 19 18:55:54 CEST 2015
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:32 PM, David Huberman < David.Huberman at microsoft.com> wrote: > > > In 2014 there were 12 organizations that elected to receive a 4-byte AS > number and later came back to ARIN to exchange it for a 2-byte AS number. > Each of these organizations stated issues with their transit providers > either unwilling or unable to accept the use of a 4-byte AS number by a > customer. > > It's seems as if the transit providers are mentioned a bit too frequently here. Does anyone have any information about how long it would take to get transit providers 4-byte-ready? -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150519/42ea13ba/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Review Period extended until 19 May 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Review Period extended until 19 May 2015 (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]