[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)

Hi all!

I don't understand true reasons of this proposal creation.

Let's think together. If it was created to interrupt exhaustion of
IPv4 blocks, I want retort:
today, 11.05.2015 have been allocated 6392 IPv4 from last /8
(last block is 185.99.220.0/22, 256/4=64, 64*99=6336, 6336+224/4=6392)

If we go here https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/ipv4-transfers/table-of-transfers
press ctrl+F and input 185. we can see 508 results, but we should
devide it by 2, due to there are 2 results in one transfer. So there
are 254 transfers of IPv4 from the last /8. It is 4% from all
allocated IPv4 /8.

Also you should draw your attention to some LIRs who make more than 10
transfers every day. Yes, they don't transfer IPs from last /8. But
did you think how many resources RIPE can fill if it returns unused
resources? May be we will think globaly but don't about how to close a
hole doesn't affect IPv4 exhaustion.

So I oppose this proposal.

2015-05-11 22:44 GMT+03:00, Sascha Luck [ml] <apwg at c4inet.net>:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:32:19PM +0200, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
>>This is borderline to bad faith.
>
> ISTR you not being very happy about being accused on this list,
> so I would thank you very much, indeed, not to accuse me of
> acting in bad faith.
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Sascha Luck
>
>


-- 
-----
Kind regards,
Sergey Stecenko