[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Mon May 11 19:52:02 CEST 2015
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:47:55PM +0200, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote: >On 11/05/15 19:00, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: >if I understand correctly, you are opposing to the RIPE NCC's planned >implementation of this proposal (under the terms and understanding of >this Impact Analysis), is that correct? Yep, since I can't oppose the implementation plan separately, I have to consider it part of the proposal for PDP purposes. >What If once the policy proposal would become policy and would be >implemented, _all all allocations made after the implementation date_ >will need to have a 2 years 'buffer' - would that be acceptable? Yes, I'm not opposed to the "meat" of the proposal (now that it is clear that M&A are not affected), just to the retroactive implementation. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]