[address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Mon May 11 16:36:45 CEST 2015
On Mon, 11 May 2015, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > As Nick states, "I'd be interested to see a real life addressing plan > which needed more than this amount of bit space." I'd actually be > interested to see a real life addressing plan that needed a /32 bit > address space, where the need isn't constructed based on the mere > possibility of getting that space instead of merely e.g. a few hundre > million times of the entire IPv4 space. -- Jan Since it's perfectly valid to ask for /48 per customer, with companies having tens of millions of customers, it's not a problem to motivate larger than /29. The proposed change doesn't change this at all as far as I can tell. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Policy Proposal (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]