[address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksey Bulgakov
aleksbulgakov at gmail.com
Wed May 6 08:53:21 CEST 2015
What's wrong in /22 hoarding? How does it abuse the system? 06 Май 2015 г. 9:30 пользователь "Max Tulyev" <mtl at netassist.ua> написал: > Yes, that's the price of *clean* IPv4 /22 on the market, without any > trackable criminal history. > Yes, spammers *can* register a new LIR for /22. And I believe they (or > somebody for them) *do* that. > No, people buy clean /22 *not* only for sendind spam. Good business want > good IPs and wish to pay some money for that. > BUT, some good companies don't want/can't start-up a horde of LIRs using > a horde of shell companies, and one /22 is as small as not visible for > them. They need /16 for example, and wish to pay some money for just > buying a network. The price I know is from $6 to $15 per IP. > > That's the source of that hoarding /22 business. If you want to > eliminate it really - the only real way is to kill a profit. > > On 04.05.15 14:50, Tomasz SLASKI wrote: > > $10k for /22 is the speculative price of 'virgin space' offered for > > spammers, who buy /22 and then burn it out on every blacklist in the > > World, making the addresses practically unusable for long time. Who > > havinghealthy brain is buying /22 for $10k, for 'normal' purposes, if he > > can buy with no questions /22 by just opening a new LIR? > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150506/e149b60a/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Hoarding /22 out of 185/8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]