[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Garry Glendown
garry at nethinks.com
Tue Jun 30 08:57:33 CEST 2015
> Am 29.06.15 um 23:52 schrieb Petr Umelov: >> In 2 years the second block can be in black list and it is better to >> receive it earlier > Hi, > > now that was a Freudian slip that gives us a hint what the underlying > business model really is. > > If ISPs burn through networks in a rate that puts whole /22s on > blacklists within two years' time, they should think about the reasons > instead of crying wolf. > > Why should RIPE, RIPE NCC, the community as a whole or anyone else help > those people run a parasitic business model? I was already wondering about that, too ... ;) Looks like 2015-1 has more benefits than we originally thought ;) -garry
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]