[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Jun 29 22:53:40 CEST 2015
Hi, On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:23:19PM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote: > One more argument. > > For example LIR has IPv4 185.100.104.0/22 and 185.100.116.0/22 (we talk that multi LIRs accounts don't abuse the system and LIR can have such IPs) > > But LIR's infrastructure needs to have /21. LIR can write to 185.100.108.0/22 owner and change his 185.100.116.0/22. > > But LIR has to wait for 24 months to do it if this proposal is approved. There is nothing that you could do with a /21 that you could not do with 2x /22. Except, maybe, sell it off as a "single /21". Next. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150629/868e3bd6/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]