[address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vladimir Andreev
vladimir at quick-soft.net
Mon Jun 29 21:47:19 CEST 2015
Hello! Why not to write down and weigh all the arguments for and against the proposal? 29.06.2015, 22:44, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:34:32PM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote: >> Hi.<br /><br />The RIPE NCC receives /9 from IANA every 6 months > > It does not. > > And please, arguments like "this will not stop abuse", "this is not > going far enough", "we have enough addresses" and "it's my good right > to make money out of the last-/8 policy and so do not call it abuse!!" > have been heard and duly considered. > > If you can come up with a NEW argument that can be reasonably backed > by factual arguments, we're all ears. > > Repeating what was already repeated often enough in discussion and review > phase will only annoy people into ignoring you. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] We need IPv4 transfers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]