[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
apwg at c4inet.net
Sun Jun 21 20:05:27 CEST 2015
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 06:24:27PM +0200, Thomas Drewermann wrote: >I forgot one tought in my first mail. >To be particular about the policy in my opinion guest networks >provided by PI assigment holders e.g. companies aren't legitimate use >either. >Because addresses are leased to users/devices which don't belong the >company holding the PI assignment. >That addresses could be treated as assignments to third parties as well. ISTR this discussion on this list before ;) I think the consensus was that single devices, temporarily becoming part of the End User's network, do not count as "assignment to third parties". It's a different story for a /64 assigned to a customer's VM infrastructure though - which is perhaps comparable to the Freifunk case... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]