[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vladimir Andreev
vladimir at quick-soft.net
Fri Jun 19 14:06:53 CEST 2015
Hello! Why wouldn't they become a LIR? 19.06.2015, 15:03, "Thomas Drewermann" <thomas at freifunk-rheinland.net>: > Dear colleagues, > > we recently requested an IPv6 assingment on behalf of one Freifunk > Community in germany. > They wanted to be indipendent from us and to take routing decisions on > their own. > As they are a freifunk community some of the PI assigment would be used > to lease addresses to clients/users. > According to NCC the policy currently doesn't permit usage of PI space. > > Small Hotspot providers and especially Freifunk communities typically > can not afford a LIR Membership to be independent. In my opinion the > current policy makes it hard to adopt IPv6 in such cases. > > I'd like to propose a change of the policy to allow PI addresses to be > used for clients which don't belong the assigment-holder. This clients > are connecting to networks which use address space of the holders PI > assignment e.g. via wifi. > > The difference between an assignment is that there is a single address > provided to walk in wifi users rather than a whole subnet delegated for > usage by the connecting client/user/customer. > > How do you think about that situation? > What would be your thoughts on such a proposal? > > Regards > Thomas Drewermann > Freifunk Rheinland e.V. -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI assignment policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]