[address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Fri Jun 12 00:41:03 CEST 2015
Hi Jan, thanks for you reply Il 11/06/2015 23.56, Jan Ingvoldstad ha scritto: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Riccardo Gori <rgori at wirem.net > <mailto:rgori at wirem.net>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > fixed that I am against abuses. I think we have to keep in mind > that RIPE task is resource distribution not holding them in a drawer. > > > (...) > > > 06/2015 - AVAILABLE IPv4 /8s IN > RIPE 1.09 > ARIN 0.13 > https://www.ripe.net/publications/ipv6-info-centre/about-ipv6/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-available-pool-graph > https://www.arin.net/ > > task: distribute resources. ARIN has almost reached the task don't > you think? > Was ironic to point out that there are many different point of views. Someone thinks that IPv6 will grow when IPv4 will be completly exhausted. I can't see any other reason to allow inter-RIR transfert (2014-05) to address the need of address space where is available or "stock-piled and unused" So the good guy who stockpiled is the old cheater that needed IPv4 /15 - /17 or the new cheater that needed many IPv4 /22 ? I see no differences. About the policy in RIPE region: Acceped march 2015: 2014-04, "Removing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8" Acceped april 2015: 2014-05 Proposal Accepted (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of Internet Resources) I see easiness in 2015-01 I see "alignement", you can find the same rule 24months in 2014-05 > > Without acknowledging your interpretation of "distributing resources", > I would like to point out that when ARIN in a very short time no > longer has any of these resources to distribute, they will, _forever_, > fail to do their task, while RIPE still will carry out that task. I think they should have an IPv6 /12 as other RIRs to distribute... > > So if we accepted your premise that that is _The Task_, RIPE will be > performing the task better than ARIN, and not vice versa. > -- > Jan I think both are complying the task as well as the bottom-up approved policies. regards good night Riccardo -- Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori at wirem.net wirem.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150612/b1078ade/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 41774 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150612/b1078ade/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]