[address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 20:48:04 CEST 2015
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Staff <office at ip4market.ru> wrote: > > > Let's say give new LIR /21 (2048IP). It will be more then enough for > several years. And I will tell why. Becouse it will drop the market > price low and stop some speculations. And a lot of people will start > selling resources that they don't need. And people who need IPs - they > will be able to get enough from RIPE in standard way. There is no > secrets here. Everything is clear. If more people work in this clear and > fair way - the more people will offer own IPs for others. > > There will be no luck of IPs. Just more redistribution. > > What do community thinks? > > You seem to lack an argument as to why 2048 addresses would make everything so much "better" than 1024 addresses. -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150611/ccd50647/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Next steps for new LIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]