[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 46, Issue 35 Conflict of Interests
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 11:10:33 CEST 2015
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:31 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > > > The draft document for the proposal described in 2015-01, "Alignment of Transfer > > Requirements for IPv4 Allocations" has been published. > > Strongest possible support; if anything, this does not go far enough. Also support current proposal. > I will readily admit that I can not come up with a text which prevents > abuse _and_ allows for valid operational needs, though. Indeed. Mergers & acquisitions are real-world business events that APWG cannot affect. I see a big nut to crack on how to address abuse via "illegitimate" M&A, including figuring out what is and what is not "illegitimate" and "abuse". As always, I believe address pricing will be most straight-forward way to manage this for remaining RIPE region v4 pools. /M
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 46, Issue 35 Conflict of Interests
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]