[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Jun 9 23:19:08 CEST 2015
Opteamax GmbH wrote: [...] > The "big old players" which intentionally do not roll out IPv6, because > they earn much more money with V4, would finally start rolling out V6 if > this money-printer wouldn't work anymore because unused space would be > withdrawn. I look at the publicly reported measurements from content publishers like Akamai: http://www.akamai.com/ipv6 Google: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=ipv6-adoption Cloudflare: https://blog.cloudflare.com/four-years-later-and-cloudflare-is-still-doing-ipv6-automatically/ and see fairly steep curves that I would not enjoy cycling up. And when I look at the trend graphs for the top 10 networks reporting via http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ I see something very similar. That's clearly not the whole story but it's certainly not all doom and gloom. Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]