[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 17:22:43 CEST 2015
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no> wrote: > I call this spam: http://p.ip.fi/Zid3 Actually, I call this worse than spam as it not only spams, it misrepresents which mechanism the mail has been sent through on purpose. It was an outright lie. > When spammers and abusers like you dislike the proposal so > much, that is a very good reason to support it, in my estimation. I could not agree more. I expect the answer to be no, and for good reason. Yet, could chairs comment on if there is a way to exclude people from participating on this and other RIPE mailing lists? Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]