[address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue Jun 9 14:34:47 CEST 2015
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 13:00, Garry Glendown wrote: > own address space. So without other effects of returned addresses, I > would imagine that timeframe to be more like 3 years in the end. Now It will make the "last /8 policy" last about 5 years (maybe 6), out of which 2.5 have already passed. > look at the uptake of IPv6 at both providers and end customers - do you > really believe that the Internet will be ready to go IPv6-only within > three years? I would love to see that, but I seriously doubt it ... so No, but it will most likely get to a point where people can no longer ignore it (as is the case today). > anybody left at that point in time with only IPv6 addresses will be f*cked ... As for those needing v4 space: - there will be a clear signal to get v6 *deployed* - transfer market will still be in place. ... as for v4 needs, new players are already fscked .... And BTW, +1 for 2015-01 in case I didn't mention it already -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]