[address-policy-wg] policy 2015-1
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] policy 2015-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Jun 9 11:28:36 CEST 2015
Hi, On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 01:45:27PM +0430, Amir Mohsenian wrote: > Hi, > > -1 > I cannot support this proposal.( 2015-01) Repeating the statement and still not explaining *why* you object is not exactly "spelling out your objection". Again: the consensus based process is based on voicing objections, and giving the proposer (or the people that support a proposal) the chance to *address* the objection. This is an important part of the process, and if you decide to not follow it, even if told so by the chair, your mails will not receive a very strong weight when judging consensus at the end of the discussion phase. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 811 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150609/296677b6/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] policy 2015-1
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-01 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]