[address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Jul 22 18:24:07 CEST 2015
Hi Petr, > I mean the next > > Frome: "Ingrid Wijte" <ingrid at ripe.net> > Date: 3 March 2015 г. 12:52 > > Subject: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE NCC Receives a /13 from IANA's Recovered IPv4 Pool > To: <ncc-announce at ripe.net> > > [...] > > With the current policy in place, the RIPE NCC will receive one-fifth of > any recovered addresses in the pool every six months (every March and > September). This is not a fixed size. As Leo has already shown you the size RIPE NCC gets has been smaller each time. But to avoid any lengthy discussions on 2015-01: it has been *concluded*. As working group chair I have made my decision and I decided that there is consensus on 2015-01. If you do not agree with this decision then please use the appeals procedure [1]. There is no point in discussing this any further on this mailing list as I have thoroughly reviewed everything and I stand by my decisions. Cheers, Sander [1] https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-642 section 4
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]