[address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Jul 22 18:04:05 CEST 2015
Hi Petr, Petr Umelov wrote: [...] > > Petr Umelov was under the impression that RIPE NCC receives > > a fixed size IPv4 block from IANA every 6 months, which is not > > correct as pointed out by Leo Vegoda. > > But the RIPE NCC receives a fixed size. But you don't consider it. I do not understand what you mean. Can you please explain? In May 2014 the RIRs each received the equivalent of a /11. That dropped to a /12 in September 2014 and a /13 or equivalent in March 2015. Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Final consensus on 2015-01: Alignment of Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]