[address-policy-wg] PA policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
d.baeza at tvt-datos.es
Tue Jul 7 14:59:25 CEST 2015
I thing he understand "end user" as a residential customer user. But a residential customer user is not recieving the PA space, is the ISP of the customer who recieve it. LIR is not ISP. You can be a LIR and not an ISP and vice versa. El 07/07/2015 a las 14:55, Nick Hilliard escribió: > On 07/07/2015 13:31, Kennedy, James wrote: >> At the risk of sounding naïve, I have a question regarding the >> legitimate usage of PA address space. That is, what *type* of network or >> End User can it be assigned to. >> >> "LIRs are allocated Provider Aggregatable (PA) address space. They >> sub-allocate and assign this to *downstream networks*." >> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-643#7 >> >> To me this reads networks or End Users assigned PA space must receive >> transit from the LIR holding the parent allocation. >> >> Or can the LIR assign PA blocks to customers/companies that don't >> receive transit, or any other technical network service for that matter, >> from the LIR? > > There are two separate things going on here. > > 1. LIRs can assign PA blocks for any reason at all since policy 2013-03 was > accepted. > > 2. if an end user receives a PA block from LIR1 and then attempts to route > it out through a different network who operates LIR2, that's an issue for > the end user, LIR1 and LIR2 to resolve. The RIPE NCC is not the routing > police and has no policy basis to intervene. > > Situation #2 is relatively common and becoming more so. > > From an end user point of view, it's a pretty damned stupid thing to do > because if the end user terminates their business relationship with LIR1, > then they terminate any rights to use the address space they received from > LIR1. This puts the them in the situation where their business continuity > depends on a contractual relationship with a single supplier. Not clever. > > From the point of view of LIR1, some LIRs run with this as a business model > in order to prevent customers moving away. > > From the point of view of LIR2, this often ends up causing problems between > them, the end user and LIR1. > > Nick >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PA policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]