[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Vladimir Andreev <vladimir at quick-soft.net>
wrote:

> Please don't tell about Last Call.
>
> In Review you also didn't considered point of view which differs from you
> own.
>

The point of views you have expressed, HAVE been discussed, and they have
been considered previously, by the working group.

You are free to feel that they haven't been adequately considered, and that
point is adequately made.

However, your point of view didn't gain consensus, or even break consensus.

At this point in time, it's too late for you to raise the same points
again, no matter how much you disagree with how things stand.

At this point in time, you may raise NEW concerns. You haven't, though.

I see that you feel it's more important to make noise, than to follow the
procedures.

If you really felt so strongly about this, which I sincerely doubt, you
would have started the process with a counter-proposal, annulling the
effects of 2015-01. You could have had a new proposal on the table right
away, and the PDP could have started, and if your proposal gained
consensus, it could have taken effect early next year.

But your choice is to make noise instead. This is disrespectful to us other
group members.


PS:

WG chairs, my apologies for posting this, but I really, really felt the
need to point out that this isn't just something of Gert's doing.
-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150701/509de043/attachment.html>