[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Aleksi Suhonen ripe-ml-2012 at ssd.axu.tm
Fri Jan 23 11:02:01 CET 2015

Hello,

I'd like to state again, that sticking to the current policy is only 
hurting people that have already adopted IPv6 using PI space. "The bad 
guys" that aren't even planning to ever adopt IPv6 will happily reserve 
an IPv6 block just to get more IPv4 addresses.

I hope this message gets across to the people who oppose 2014-04. You're 
not helping your own cause.

For more information, read the archives of the 2014-04 discussion from 
last year.

-- 
	+358 4567 02048 / http://www.trex.fi/
	Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy

     `What I need,' shouted Ford, by way of clarifying his
     previous remarks, `is a strong drink and a peer-group.'
        -- Douglas Adams, Life the Universe and Everything

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ address-policy-wg Archives ]