[address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Daniel Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Jan 20 10:22:30 CET 2015
On 20/01/15 08:08, Tore Anderson wrote: > * "Marco Schmidt" <mschmidt at ripe.net> > >> The proposal described in 2014-12, "Allow IPv6 Transfers", is now in >> its Review Phase. > The need for IPv6 tranfers are probably going to be miniscule as IPv6 > numbers are readily available from the NCC, but nevertheless I think it > makes sense to harmonise the transfer policies for all the different > resource types we have. > > In some corner cases a transfer could prevent the need to renumber > (parts of) a network though. It's worth having this just to support > folks in that position. > > +1 > > Tore > I also support it, it's a good idea to have a policy that allows the transfer of all kinds of resources. /elvis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-12 Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Allow IPv6 Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]