[address-policy-wg] late conciliatory response to 2014-03

* Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>

> As a working group we need to decide a few things:
> - do we want to make it easy to get ASNs? (the answer seems to be "yes")

Yep. I'm not opposed to saying that the applicant must have *some* form
of technical need for it. Multihoming would be one valid requirement,
but it shouldn't be the only qualifying technical need.

I liked the first version of the proposal...

> - do we want to place a limit?

I agree that it's not ideal.

> - do we wait for the next RIPE NCC charging scheme to see if that
> solves our problems?

Do we have any idea if the board will propose an ASN charge at the
Spring GM? (Hi Nigel!)

I think waiting would make sense if we know that an ASN charge is in
the works.

Tore